British Journalism Review    
HomeCurrent EditionArchiveBlogSubscription & Back IssuesAbout the BJRLinksContact the BJR
Archive

Article

Bill Hagerty

Greatest Columnists: And the winners are...

British Journalism Review
Vol. 15, No. 1, 2004, pages 6-7

Contents - Vol 15, No 1, 2004

Editorial - Cleaning up the act 3


The greatest columnists

Bill Hagerty - And the winners are... 6

Keith Waterhouse - Those I have loved — and loathed 7


After Hutton

Michael Brunson - Putting ourselves beyond reproach 13

Brian Winston - Say goodnight, nurse 19

Julian Petley - Balancing the books 23

Roger Harrabin - Risky business 28


Harold Evans - Propaganda versus professionalism 35

Sean Magee - Whipping-boys 43

Peter Preston - Tabloids: only the beginning 50

Victor Davis - Murder, we wrote 56

Chris Frost - For the sake of the children 63

Alec Charles - Racist, or just animal crackers? 68


BOOK REVIEWS
Michael Leapman on Christine Fanthome 73

Joe Haines on Colin Seymour-Ure 76

Ned Sherrin on Donald Zec 79

Bruce Page on Michael Wolff 81

Brenda Maddox on Arthur Gelb 84

Richard Littlejohn on Bernard Shrimsley 87


  In his pungent essay on newspaper columnists (BJR, 14/3), Bernard Shrimsley observed: “Great columnists make the difference good sauces make.” Alongside Shrimsley’s piece, Geoffrey Goodman asked: “Who is the greatest British national newspaper columnist of all time; and who is the greatest of those writing today?” It would be difficult to choose, reflected Goodman, and the varied response to the BJR’s Greatest Columnists Poll proved him right. There have been, and still are, readers decided, a great number of sauce chefs par excellence in the kitchens of our national press.

A total of 24 nominations was received from those voting for the presentday columnist they rated most highly. Only four of those were women. One of the men, The Guardian’s Hugo Young, died after the polling finished and his votes were transferred to the all-time section of the poll. Excluding Hugo’s, 15 names were put forward as the “greatest” columnist of all time. Just one woman, The Guardian’s Jill Tweedie, was nominated. Among those attracting wide support were Bernard Levin and George Orwell, who tied for second place. Remarkably, two of the remainder were nominated in both categories and these still-industrious writers soon emerged as the leaders of the pack in the present-day section of the poll.

It would be invidious to reveal the names of all the nominees from those still in business – if only to spare the feelings of the dozens of those whose names did not emerge at all in voting that produced unequivocal results in both categories.

There must be one exception to our no-naming policy: Alan Watkins, of The Independent but for a long time putting forward his trenchant views in The Observer, received support in the “all-time” category and was the clear runner-up in the voting for the most highly regarded contemporary columnist. The writer gathering most votes here – and tying with Watkins among the best-ever runners – was the indefatigable Keith Waterhouse, the one-man words factory whose twice-weekly column has been running for 34 years, first in the Daily Mirror and, since 1988, in the Daily Mail.

The columnist who was considered the greatest of them all was, perhaps, predictable. Certainly he recorded more than double the votes of his nearest challenger. The universally admired Bill Connor, aka Cassandra of the Daily Mirror, died in 1967 at the age of 57, shortly after receiving a knighthood for services to journalism.